It
is sometimes best to view artists from a standpoint at an angle
to their own standpoint. Texture becomes visible when the light
falls at a slant. We see all kinds of detail we weren't supposed
to. But often, it is good to view an artist from exactly the same
angle at which they stand – to capture the data as a primary
act of apprehension, the acquisition which will later enable us
to think or talk about it.
Some
poets see the visual as the source of transient but immensely detailed
knowledge which turns the brain on, out of a resting state of "grey
array"; and thought as a by-blow of visual processing. Nothingness
is a prison of thought from which the visual is the escape. Shared
images are then the basis of the collective imaginary and so of
politics; one attempts to limit this dependence by memorising the
visual and reflecting on its power. For them, poetry is a visual
medium. A revolution in the visual world also means a revolution
in poetry; the road from photography to digital graphics has brought
parallel changes in poetic style.
I
have decided to associate Ayres, Kelvin Corcoran, and Robert Sheppard,
all born 1956-59, as a group. The name I have given to this group – as
a handle – is Poets of the New Pictorial Economy.
Discussion need not be distracted too much by the fact that this
group would logically include me, as well; something which needed
to be declared, in order to lighten our load. We could possibly
associate Jeremy Reed (b.1951), who exhibits tantalisingly varied
developments of the same themes. Reed is the only one of this named
group to have engaged with High Street success, the most prolific,
the most artistically wayward (in the eyes of many) – and
the most involved with pictorial glamour.
These
poets had in common that they missed the revolutionary cultural
upbeat of the 1970s, except as students and consumers of art; were
sorely at odds with the New Right hedonism of the 1980s; have largely
been ignored by criticism; became very prolific, perhaps reacting
against rejection; explored large-scale forms; were formed by rock
culture, and do not perceive a vital 'high-low' difference between
poetry and rock music; and that they are fascinated by the new
pictorial economy which scatters streets and homes with images – and
by the processes which developed those images, filling them with
overt and covert content. I often associate this sensibility with
Tony Benn's two books of the early Eighties, Arguments for
Democracy and Arguments for Socialism, where he swept
the economy of information to the foreground of politics, arguing
against the whole ownership structure of the information media,
and exposing the political bias which dictated the content of the
chattel media. This is the pictorial economy - the system of mills
and pulleys by which images are assembled, transformed in a lavish
and highly capitalised way from their dull and dumb originals in
the real world. Once you see an image as an idea (which means something
visual, etymologically), you then ask whose idea is it – whose
vision.
The
poets in question often seem to be writing from inside a system
of pictures – Corcoran's Our Thinking
Tracts being an example of this. As a basis for acute
criticism of social reality and of the shallow images of affirmative
culture, they also have a private and self-confident set of internal
images. The poems move through those images, without ever sinking
to an inventory, a paraphrase.
This
may not be the best name. Any name would have done in order to
study Ayres in a landscape in which he is at the centre, rather
than one where the centre is Black Mountain in the 1950s, or Cambridge
in the 1970s, or Huddersfield in the 1980s, and the poet's essential
traits register as amusingly deviant. Other names might work better.
I first thought of Young Marble Giants,
after a line of Kelvin's which appears just before one of Ayres'
poems, in Angel Exhaust 10:
Young
marble giants sleep inside us,
that virtue which fills the body with itself,
limbs and head emerging from stone
if only I could, as if to take a step.
O you islands of men and women.
(from Melanie's
Book).
The
line comes of course from the name of a band, one who appeared
on Rough Trade Records, were Welsh Marxists (roughly), made the
wonderful 'Final Days' in 1981, and vanished. I heard a rumour
that they are still playing (and live downstairs from someone I
know?), but in practice someone who knows their name belongs to
a specific generation - the generation, of course, of the poets
we are discussing. (The band took it from some guide-book about
Greek sculptures standing on a headland somewhere.) I rather liked
the link of visual art, politics, and rock and roll. However, the "young" bit
is by now misleading. I liked the "giant" bit, too. I
toyed with the phrase "lost marble giants". Oh well.
The giants suggested a drama of idealism: a recognition that the
created visual world expressed ideals rather than an actuality
able to reproduce itself. The drama confronted the capitalist Utopia
fervently promoted by the owners of the media with the socialist
and humanist Utopia desired by the poets.
Part
of the Ayres legend is as someone under-published, impassively
ignoring the tasks of literary networking in order to spend the
largest possible amount of time writing the largest possible number
of poems. Art is wealth. This situation, the external aspect of
which will be transformed by the publication of this shearsman
Gallery and the forthcoming release of a.m. from Salt Books, is
comparable to the other New Pictorial Economy poets in certain
decades of their careers. It was a formative environment which
disappears - built over, but leaving its trace in the physiology
of the inhabitants.
"The
plump sun of a segmented tangerine burns on the saucer by the side
of the pool: that taste is fire slowed and synthesized, stored
in batteries of sugar, and the rays bend now into Lexington handmade
paper 622 x 800mm, burns later in the suicide's blaze, where one
dies of life, unable to continue: one, water dripping down back,
buttocks and thighs, feels the bones enter the terrifying medium
of cancer, now watches lover whipping a tethered dog with a leather
lash, the greyhound eyes, the shivering physique, eyes of a Mary,
a suffering Madonna, watches and does not intervene.
(...)
One pounds a piano, a hefty grand, a lacquered beats, beauty from blood, sonata
from carcass, the smile of teeth, pounds, pounds, pounds, titillates, pounds,
caresses, a rippling smile, moral grandeur with a yellow label, Deutsche Grammophon,
a cubist crocodile fed on fingers of Schoenberg, and opens the jaws like a
yawning patron on the void of boredom, one's private disease, an ivory throat
yawning, and yawning - first fear, then fury, then melancholia, then despair."
'Deposition'
goes on like this for 5 A4 pages (of Grille #3, 1994),
imitating the visual imagination of advertisements, taking on the
MegaVisual tradition (in Peter Fuller's phrase) and excelling it.
The poem stages a self-love-nest of commodity fetishism and climaxes
with a quote from the Sex Pistols, a flashback to Situationism.
There
seems to be a connection, in the atmosphere of German Idealism,
between the ideal visual forms of Greek sculpture, and the behavioural
and intellectual ideals discussed by the leisured heroes of Plato's
dialogues. In modern radical thought, there is a way leading from
a dispassionate consideration of visual creations to the ideal
forms towards which they strive; and on from this visualisation
of the ideal to an emotional withdrawal from the forms of law and
social life actually obtaining. Because of Marx's classical
background and enthusiasms, the whole line of Marxism has remained
soaked in this line of German Idealism, as we realise when we look
at Soviet architecture and painting, or consider the Soviet bloc's
preoccupation with athletics.
Looking,
thus, at the Soviet realm's visual order of ideal bodies
and stone-enveloped ceremonial spaces is bound to remind us of
the idealised world which saturates our streets. This is peculiarly
an era when architecture is ignored or covered over by flat photographic
images. When, too, the three-dimensional reality of oranges is
felt to be less stimulating than the 2-dimensional, artificially
staged and lit, image of oranges on the label. These images, too
shallow to breathe in, are also ideals – a visual economy
as the satisfaction of desires. Commodity praise art is a skinny
Utopia offering a pattern for each grouping of humans, which is
more concentrated and significant than those formed by the real
humans around them, and can act as a model for them. The wonderful
technology of pictures draws us into a state of dependence, brings
us the temptation of immersion, and teaches us to use the off switch
of detachment. The street of pictures shows us the society we desire
as a didactic refrain to the actual scenes and groupings. Its frames
are a social grammar for forming utterances or acts.
The
poetry of the New Pictorial Economy has been far-reachingly oriented
to take on this visual grammar - to seize it and sequence it. The
poets of the group have taken on this interconnected, self-repeating,
false yet lush visual world, in a struggle so intimate that it
turns into a relationship. The lag between retinal perception and
the formation of a model in the brain, with its star-burst of neural
activity, has been prolonged, to become the site where poets excel,
the special place of poetry. As a side-effect, it is the location
where the artist deviates from the merely objective and common,
to create an impossibly rich and personal world, as mandated by Symbolisme.
When the visual is so detached from its own archaic grounds in
the physical, it gives us information about what is no longer archaic
but actually timeless – our own biological desires; and,
consequently, a state in which those desires would be satisfied – and
we, replete.
The
invasion of the offered public imagery by pressure-groups can also
be interpreted as a wish to enter those images – by pushing
to the centre of them, you tacitly accept that they are central.
Contest over what too many people desire to have shows us, nonetheless,
what desire is animated by. Love that hurting thing y'all. In the
new visual economy, litigation takes place over images rather than
over land ownership. The insubstantial is thus made fundamental.
The litigation process damaged the images, in which we were then
forced to live. The projection of intact wish images is then a
restitution for a new population, as transcendentally beautiful
landscape images were restitution for a displaced rural population,
which lived in cities and wished to live in the country. The intellect
perpetually seeks an intact visual plane, full of clear relationships
as the basis for its struggles to model the truth, and perpetually
shatters it, realising conflict in order to collapse and lose its
grounds.
A
1955 essay by David Sylvester remarks that "The most obvious
difference between the art of today and art of the inter-war period
is that rough surfaces have taken the place of smooth ones." He
speaks of "the growth of moss or lichen which is suggested
by the textures of certain English neo-Romantic painting, the wear
and patination undergone by archaeological relics". This distinction
is probably crucial for how we take to Ayres' work. It is extremely
smooth, it has a mighty depth of field which requires perfect lighting
conditions and a suitable self-arrangement of objects; it advances
irresistibly, like a bus. As Sylvester indicates, painters of the
existentialist era saw damage as the sign of authenticity. But
why should the authentic not be intact? is that not why it is authentic?
Surely rough textures can quite well be projective, subjective,
fashionably predictable. "Two decades ago", the English
critic wrote, "the current ideal was a streamlined finish,
clean, precise, immaculate(.)" This is Ayres' current ideal,
swimming in a world of techno music, steadicams, and mathematically
generated films.
Naturally,
the clash between the overall nature of the optically available
world-surface and the linear, punctual nature of language causes
problems at the level of metre. The posing and solution of these
problems – of perpetually turning a plane into a string of
points which recompose as a plane – is the project which
Ayres has given his workshop over to.
It
is premature, no doubt, to write at length about Ayres' work when
so much of it has not been published. He strikes me as someone
almost totally uninfluenced by modern poetry. The influences we
do detect go all the way back to Baudelaire, Rimbaud, and Mallarmé;
influences dissolved, to be sure, in the workings of contemporary
awareness, but which do concretize and converge as a "New
Symbolisme". The key form-element is the Symbol, a visual
image integrating various objects or parts. The origin of the image
is within the artist's psyche, and it is not being corrected by
reference to a physical original. Signature emerges in the way
in which it is developed. We could speak of images that obey the
laws of music. We should consider other Symbolists such as Paul
Claudel, Leconte de Lisle, St Pol Roux, Verhaeren. His endlessly
expanding pictures are carefully programmed; this is not quite
surrealism.
Let's
look for a moment at a passage from The
Symbolic Church of the Red Truth:
John
puts the grey stone into the cold box
In the cold box there is a grey stone
In the cold box there is a stone there is greyness
In the cold box is the grey stone John put there
John puts aluminium into the cold box
Jeff puts a yellow crayon into the cold box
In the cold box a yellow crayon rests beside a grey stone
In the cold box a yellow crayon rests beside aluminium
They are safe in the cold box - the grey stone, aluminium and the yellow crayon
They are there in the cold box
They are things in the cold box
Sometimes the cold box is the eye
Sometimes the cold box is 'memory'
Sometimes the cold box is mind
Sometimes the cold box is language
Sometimes the cold box is a flamingo
Sometimes the cold box is an instant
Sometimes the cold box is 'there'
The
same phrase appears in 18 successive lines. This is a striking
technical device. It may represent the poet's generation of fictive
space: by a process of cellular doubling and variation, repeated
indefinitely. We are bound to be reminded of Spiritualised - a
band who use two-chord structures to produce an effect of shimmering
and hovering, as we lose a sense of musical 'forward' and 'back':
forward is the same as back. Something else we are bound to be
reminded of is House music, with its dervish-like repetition of
nuclear phrases, stored in a sequencer. The endless symmetry with
its rippling, shifting breaches puts the centre of the work inside
itself: it is convergent, which is the first requirement for any
artificial world. This sounds like the self-teaching program of
an automaton, acquiring cognitive structures through a minimal
vocabulary and untiring procedures. By a slight shift, this could
be the program which generates a digital landscape in a film -
or in the code of a video game. The same doubling, splitting, and
shifting gives, just further on, the lovely
the
azure acid of melancholia the rook acid of foreboding.
Marshal is
my favourite Ayres poem and is, we now learn, one of five poems,
planned as a book, from the early 90s, the other four of which
were 'Pool', 'Sad Idyl' (published in Angel
Exhaust 16), 'Failed
Captain', and 'Nosferatu' which appears in the Shearsman Gallery.
'Marshal' was published in Angel Exhaust 10,
and concerns a US marshal, a cattle town gunfighter from some classic
and forgotten
Western, come to face down and seize the poet for an unnamed crime.
The scene is one from some lost Surrealist film, of lovers chased
by malign authority. The Marshal is Tom Mix as the 'taxonomic loco'
who reduces the wild lands of the West and the psyche to miserable,
apathetic order. Of all Ayres' poems, this has the most brilliantly
changing images, like shards of glass flying apart just slowly
enough for us to see:
Then
you come as a china dog tied with a morphine bow,
you come as lacunae, in senile pools,
you bring us what we forget in sacks of crushed wheels,
with clocks dipped in lard;
you come as a tiny barking dog,
a tiny ornamental dog from off a mantel,
an Anubis smaller than the eye
of a Lilliputian, tinkling needle.
In
rooms of dishevelled memory,
a Jacob's angel of dirt and throwing winds on through,
a localised hurricane, diminutive then suddenly vast,
centreless, but perfumed,
trailing anxieties and desires:
I have passed close by you,
have reached and lost you
The
openness to imagery is as if his studio were built with one glass
wall. A poet who writes visually has to compete with other visual
artists and to provide an adequate answer to the problems of visual
thinking. The benefit is this purling fluency - you wade into the
river and can then scoop what you want out of it. Correlatively,
the poems offer themselves to our acoustic "scoop" with
few or no retrieval problems. They are not cryptographic, paradoxical,
violating the code they are written in. They reflect an imagined
and experienced serene phase of existence, not frantic uncertainty
in some hellish transit zone lost between two states of true being.
Ayres
is concerned with the reverberations of a single phrase, protracting
its acoustic decay "till each fleck is a long black smear",
putting it through the most amazing mutations without breaking
the initial impulse. The variation is more important than the starting
image. Everything dissolves, metamorphoses. Symbolisme instructs
a defection from the levelling world of the rational, shared, and
legalistic. A refusal to adjust the lens to a shared norm - a portrait
of the behaviour of the lens rather than of the visible, real,
world. The dominance of personal style was defined by Albert Hauser
as bourgeois subjectivism, something which arrived in the middle
of the nineteenth century. That was the start of the era we are
still in. Maybe we start with a library of shared images and acquire
personality by inducing differentiation in them.
The
more the image evolves and shows process, the less it is surreal.
Surrealism is of course present, mediated no doubt through Neruda,
but we recall that it was in fact a mutation of Symbolisme, and
the objects which populated its oneiric scenes were largely left
over from the warehouse of Symbolisme. Ayres is not interested
in the momentary and contradictory montage, his key values are
the abiding nature of the image conjured up from nowhere, its autonomy
visavis the psyche which created it. These are not scribbled sketches
but as it were built in brass and marble.
As
someone else influenced by the French, who adopted surrealism but
did not want to surrender expressive control, we could name JF
Hendry – a predecessor. His concept of the expanding image seems
relevant:
Flower,
yarrow, and the starry
Thistle throughout her temporal death!
Flower and flowering doubly, bear
This supersession of breath
Into the dreamless kingdom where
All substance, shape and motion
Find fulfilment of conception.
(from The
Orchestral Mountain)
Let
us break into blue music, like the sea,/ This hour-glass shivering
at the wind's note. Hendry could devise brilliant lines
but has none of Ayres' mastery of organisation in depth – his
power to throw in violent shifts of direction which strengthen
the cumulative image rather than interrupting it.
Whether
rough or smooth, the boundary between the voluntary (gratifying)
and involuntary (images that fly of their own accord) seems a vital
boundary in this animated world. Jeremy Reed's recent work has
accepted glamour photography as the authentic visual skin of the
ideal in our time, and adopted the schemas of glossy magazines
as the production values of the poem: a step too far for his peers.
The step forward into kinky erotica was in its way a move into
optimism, away from the corrosive revelations of observation of
flesh and temperament taken from life. The contest with such a
fulsomely multiplied world of scenes made possible a linear maximisation
of impact, sheer and flawless as the chassis of a new car. In its
extremism, and acceptance of media values, this work sheds a light
on more complex work - for example the Ayres of 'Deposition', for
example Barry MacSweeney's Jury Vet. The cynical isolation
and valorisation of assets at least allows us to hazard a guess
that the avant-garde's single-minded focus on one set of assets
- those of a discredited historicism and formalism - represents
a kind of tunnel vision rather than a choice which art will forever
stay with. Art has always danced with the prized assets of the
society around it, and the more this attraction is forbidden the
more it will stand for temptation and transgression.
Very early appearances were in First Offence 5 ('Raw Materials') and Angel
Exhaust 9 (1993; 'The Age of Drift'). An interesting moment in
the struggle was the anthology Ten British Poets (edited
by Paul Green, 1993), which showcased Ayres along with DS Marriott, Rod Mengham,
Nigel Wheale, and others. Green's knowledge was ahead of the game, and
the milieu should have taken advantage of this. The anthology was both timely
and of high quality. It repays looking at today. Maybe the problem was as simple
as putting Peter Larkin's share at the front – the reader was bleeding
and unconscious before they ever got to the second contributor. This was a
book which the whispering gallery of literary opinion never started whispering
about. I do recall seeing two reviews, which were animated by jealousy and
resentment, and didn't bother with any description or evaluation. On
such chances, entire periods of someone's career may depend. Compounding
the problems, no anthology with the same chronological lens has followed. This
Gallery serves as an exhibition of Ayres' work, which can usefully be
set beside Kelvin's New and Selected Poems (to
come from Shearsman in 2004), and Robert Sheppard's forthcoming Shearsman Gallery
appearance.
It would be simpler if there were a magazine we could name the group after.
In fact,
all the New Pictorial Economy poets have some connection with Shearsman.
Andrew
Duncan
April 2003
Bibliography.
Paul
Green (ed): Ten
British Poets (Spectacular Diseases,
Peterborough, 1993).
Michael
Ayres: Poems
1987-92 (Odyssey Poets, Nether
Stowey, 1994); a.m. (Salt
Publishing, Cambridge, 2003).
Kelvin
Corcoran: The
Red and Yellow Book (Textures,
London, 1986); Lyric
Lyric (Reality
Street Editions, London, 1993), When
Suzy Was (Shearsman
Books, Kentisbeare, 1999); Their
Thinking Tracts or Nations (West
House Books, Sheffield, 2001).
Robert
Sheppard: Daylight
Robbery (Stride, Exeter, 1990); The
Lores (Reality Street Editions,
London, 2003).
Jeremy
Reed: The
Isthmus of Samuel Greenberg (Trigram
Press, London, 1976), Saints
and Psychotics; Poems 1973-1974 (Enitharmon
Press, London, 1979), Walk
on Through (Spectacular Diseases, Peterborough, 1980),
Bleecker Street (Carcanet
Press, Manchester, 1980).