 |
Peter
Jaeger: Eckhart
Cars
(Salt
Publishing, Cambridge, 2004.
ISBN 1-844710-37-8. 140pp, 8.5
x 5.5ins, pb, £9.95/$15.95).
|
Experience
of Eckhart
Cars makes anything other than individual
response impossible. I'm going to begin by selecting excerpts Salt
Publications supply as leafleted publicity blurb and on the back
cover which before the book is opened give some idea of the nature
of the task in hand. First of all, there's Charles Bernstein
who tells us: 'Peter Jaeger's sprung
lyrics and imaginary aphorisms...locate the body of the text in the
mirage of the text's
own vanishing...'; then there's Steve McCaffery talking of the
text engaging '...discursive production and the "literary field"
in mutually critical times that implicate a catina of paradoxes...;
Andrea Brady talks of '... a poetry of constellated possibilities';
and, finally, there's Allen Fisher
who confesses '...once locked in you begin to question your own sanity,
you ask is this taking me into itself or is it just kidding...and
then uses how it becomes to mean this, what itself reads through
the reader'. So there you have it.
Perhaps,
Fisher is the least opaque in his analysis as Jaeger certainly
gives the reader plenty of work to do: decontextualised sound bites,
postmodern cut and paste, lists, stanzas that read like notes or
close procedure exercises where the reader completes meaning by
selecting words from a personalised vocabulary. Strangely, poems
such as 'So They Say' and 'Narrow' have the effect of overheard
conversations mimicked by a child or an eavesdropped meeting where
the serious
register and vocabulary are underlined in the absence
of coherence or outcome. But for me, at times, the work disappears
into dense pools of unquantitative, unqualitative abstraction.
Making conscious use of the abstract language of theory and philosophy
in 'Pollen' Jaeger constructs for the reader 11 pages of aphorisms,
some specifically designed to debunk the form (I hope), some earnestly
intended:
Along with the purely life-sustaining function of a yield, a
surrender
recalls profits which seemingly have no end beyond themselves.
The
more I read; the more I lie.
Currency
is ripe for lyrical finance.
Every
apex sections.
Shirkers
of the world unite.
The
collage is to the lyric as the international bank deposit is to
the
currency of origin.
The
last aphorism is particularly interesting in the context of Jaeger's
work and so too the following which I found helpful in
responding to the poems:
The
foremost way to read is to skim without
considering too
much...that way
the tone predominates over incarceration.
The
style of Eckhart Cars certainly protects
against any such 'incarceration' in the way that it avoids offering
the reader (perhaps with the exception
of 'Pollard') much to grasp on to by way of narrative, subject,
character or description — preferring
textual alienation to involvement, process
before pronouncement. The problem with
aphorisms is that they tend to offer the poet a chance
to seem wise, which I distrust, but I do trust a poet who is trying
to be honest, which for the most part is what Jaeger is trying to
be. His texts show us what he believes about poetry, what it should
encompass and its mode of
expression in a world at the point of postmodernist meltdown in which
the individual is assailed by endless babbling
of rational/irrational utterance from
which to select/endure meaning. Till in the end language dissolves
into the gobbledygook of sounds, implied and approximate
meanings of 'Sub-Twang Mustard':
troglo
blip
whiff
sole re–
strudled scut
A poem
which leaves the reader with a shaving of sense — real
or imagined.
Eckhart Cars centres
around 'Martyrologies', 8 pages of unbroken, blocked prose which
comprise concluding lines expressing
the gory, painful deaths of a long succession
of martyrs:...
All
300 of them were suffocated in a burning limekiln. He was
condemned to walk on burning coals, and
is said to have walked over them without damage before being
beheaded. 6,666 of them were put to death. He was seized tortured
and then
burnt alive. They had stones fastened about their necks and were
driven into the sea...
This
listing technique, or catena, Jaeger employs to effect in
an earlier poem 'Extension of Standard
Practice' where he sequences a sort of CNN newspeak to highlight
the euphemistic
vacuity used to describe conflict.
'Martyrologies'
functions to create horror at cruelty, wonder at fortitude
and fear
for a world that places belief before
humanity. But listing is a technique rather
than a resolution, ultimately the
reader must experience, discover and personally decide.
The
final poem in the book 'A Black Tooth in Front' is in many senses
the most sustained and 'elegant'
of his poems. Its structure follows
the
sequencing of the alphabet (that
which offers infinite possibilities of expression)
and proceeds through an accumulation
of clauses and phrases opening
with the
same letter. Jaeger uses the poem
to juxtapose human anatomy, nature,
science, convention and physical
exercise (undoubtedly more if you feel motivated
to look). The effect of this unfolding
relentless, irrelevant formal process is disquieting as, engaging
the reader, it gradually creates awareness
of coexistent order and chaos,
expressed not in terms of conflict but through
simultaneous presence. Further,
it functions to underline the vain endeavour
of humanity
and human language to derive meaning,
even within the human form, from
a vortex
of infinite possibility. Even the
formality of the alphabet is incomplete;
I
found myself anticipating how he'd
deal with XYZ, only to discover he'd
opted out of using Z and X completely,
sadly no zeros, zodiacs and xenotransplants — but
then completeness would always
ultimately rest with me.
To survive
and be of continued relevance poetry must take chances, explore
possibilities, be self-regarding; Eckhart Cars explores
all three
tasks, though I'm not convinced
that its experiments don't remain for others to perfect, which
may be where Jaeger's true contribution to poetry lies. I
was pleased to be invited to
read
this book and most certainly will revisit its ideas
and effects, though its language
maze is already beginning to fade. Yet
for
anyone truly interested in poetry
it should be examined — it's
a strange voyage in what might
become a future.