The
Dark Horse 16,
Spring 2004 (ISSN
1357-6720, ed. Gerry Cambridge, c/o 3(b)
Blantyre Mill Road, Bothwell, South Lanarkshire G71 8DD,
Scotland; Jennifer Goodrich, 70 Lincoln Avenue, Hastings-on-Hudson,
NY 10706, USA. 96pp, pb, £3 / $5. Appears bi-annually. Subscriptions
(3 issues) £11 / $18, cheques payable to 'Dark Horse Writers';
European subscriptions ex-UK £13).
Subtitled
'The Scottish-American Poetry Magazine', this is the second issue
of The Dark Horse to come my way and, like the last one,
it's a mixed but stimulating bag. The basic aesthetic direction
of magazine is formalist, but the intelligent end of formalism,
both British and American, and I enjoy the reviews for their relentless
intelligence and their combative spirit. This particular issue
revolves around a paper given in the US by Joseph S. Salemi on
'Why Poetry is Dying', and a response to it by Philip Hobsbaum.
Now, given the place of publication you might be expecting a Dana
Gioia-type diatribe against pointy-headed experimentalists, but
in fact this one mainly rails against the workshop-type poem:-
There's
no renaissance or efflorescence going on. On the contrary,
what we see around us is decay and deterioration masked by frenetic
activity and useless over-production. the situation reminds
one
of those state-subsidized factories in the old Soviet Union
that cranked out tons of shoddy goods that no one wanted. More
poetry
does not mean better poetry. It simply means a bigger pile
of stuff
to wade through.
He's
not far wrong of course, and one can forgive the rhetorical flourishes,
given that the paper was meant for reading aloud. He goes as far
as to present '8 Rules of Thumb' for practicing poets, which are
amusing and have something in common with some of the advice given
to would-be contributors to Shearsman, elsewhere on this
site. Now in amongst all the flourishes there are quite a number
of errors, partial statements, and outright misguided views, but
it's fun to read and I assume was fun to listen to. Philip Hobsbaum
— not noted for his sense of humour — is permitted
to respond here, which he does in high dudgeon. He's not wrong
to compare the current
poetry flood with the flood of fiction in the 19th century, but
both he and Salemi miss the point that the problem with the current
flood is the undifferentiated mediocrity of much of the
work being published, and awarded prizes, on both sides of the
Atlantic. Incidentally
there is a problem with alternative poetries too, but in that case
the problem is often the lack of any tools with which to judge
the material in question.
The
poetry in this issue is less to my taste, as you might expect,
but it's mostly well-written — if not quite of the kind I
find memorable. I'd sum up Dark Horse as a magazine of
good taste, with the editors knowing what they're about and what
they like.
In short, it's the antithesis of the kind of publication complained
of by Joseph Salemi. In the poetry universe there has to be room
for solid conservative publications such as this, with a solid
aesthetic underpinning.
Metre
15 (ed.
David Wheatley & Justin Quinn; Box 8745, Dublin,
Republic of Ireland. ISSN 1393-4414. €10; subscriptions (3 issues) €30
Ireland, €45 continental Europe, £28 UK.)
Metre is
one of those magazines that I'd heard of but not
actually seen — I only have so much time, after all — but
this issue looked too interesting to miss. And so it is. I'd
urge you to acquire this one for its intelligent and spirited reviews,
interesting
essays, special Rakosi feature, and some rather good poems too. Now
I suppose my taste usually tends to run to things a little more experimental
than this magazine, but at the end of the day, it's the quality
that counts, and this one has bags of it.
The standouts in the poetry selection come from Anthony Caleshu,
Randolph Healy, and Peter Robinson; Carrie Etter, who seems to
be everywhere
these days — and rightly so — comes up with another good
short poem. I rather liked the poems by Greta Stoddart & Anne
Stevenson too, and the issue opens with a typically well-crafted,
if unexceptional
lyric by Michael Longley. On the downside, however, we have some
meandering verses by Robert Pinsky, as well as Sean O'Brien's stab
at part of Dante's Inferno, which, you may not be surprised
to hear, doesn't hold a candle to Ciaran Carson's version,
which I picked up not along ago. And, speaking of Carson, this issue
has a most readable, thoughtful and well-observed essay on his work
by Michael Hinds.
The
reviews are almost all good, and cover a range of American, British
and Irish work — the sort of reviews that you can read and
learn something, as well as know whether you want to read the book(s)
under
review. The essays include Charles Altieri on American poetry's
love affair with Polish poetry (mainly Milosz, Herbert & Szymborska),
which strikes me as a fair assessment of the situation, and Peter
MacDonald on Geoffrey Hill, a singularly robust defence of Hill's
supposed 'difficulty' and
of the theme of patience in Hill's work, accompanied by a commanding
sideswipe at Tom Paulin, well-known despiser of Hill, l'homme
et l'oeuvre, and equally well-known television personality.
Paulin's been said to write poetry too, but I can't say I've noticed
anything in his published work that can be thus described. There's
also a symposium on Lowell's Collected, a vast and indigestible
tome some years overdue, and one which causes some weird dissension
here. For what it's worth, I like the splendid, orotund early
Lowell of The Quaker Graveyard, find the confessional
poems of less interest, and the Notebook 'sonnets' of
no interest at all, which means that his art declined after the
first
nervous
breakdown and went to pieces after the others. Why doesn't anyone
ever mention these awkward facts? Reviews here also of two more
very important volumes, already welcomed here: the New Collected Oppen
(now available from Carcanet in the UK), and the Complete Niedecker,
both of which are accorded careful and appreciative notices.
The
special birthday celebration for Carl Rakosi (100 years old in
September 2003), is a fine thing to see, with poems by Michael
Heller, Nicholas
Johnson, David Miller and Maurice Scully and essays by Andrew
Crozier and David Wheatley, among others.
Modern
Poetry in Translation 22:
Poets at Bush House. The BBC World Service. (Ed. Daniel Weissbort,
King's College London, University of London, Strand, London WC2R
2LS. ISBN 0-9545367-0-3, ISSN 0969-3572. Subscription (2 issues)
£22 in the UK, £26 overseas).
Daniel
Weissbort's farewell, as David Constantine takes over w.e.f. the
next issue. The first 70-odd pages include Bonnefoy on Yeats, Juhasz,
Heym, Tsvetaeva and two names that are new to me: Ortsion Bartana
(Israel) and Skender Kulenovic (Bosnia). The rest is devoted to
the BBC Poets, if I may be forgiven for so describing them: Brecht,
Couturier, J P de Dadelsen, Pilinszky / Hughes, Zinovy Zinik, plus
a memoir by Ewald Osers and a group of translations by Jonathan
Griffin. An interesting issue.
Oasis
110 (ed. Ian Robinson, 12 Stevenage Road, London
SW6 6ES. £2.50, £6 for 4 issues)
A mixed
bag this time, though Carrie Etter and Alan Baker stand out. Tessa
Ransford's German translations will turn up in a Shearsman volume
later this year. This issue's been somewhat delayed, but Oasis will
apparently shortly return to regularity. It looks a bit like Shearsman's
print
version, and that's because I stole my design from Ian Robinson.
It's the kind of magazine that's worth subscribing to if you like
Shearsman, and has published an amzing amount of good
work over the past 30-odd years.
I'm
sad to have to report that my old friend Ian Robinson, editor of
Oasis, passed away on 20 April 2004, and that therefore
number 110 was the
last issue
for which he was responsible — although his friends will
try to ensure that any pending issue is also released. It is hoped
that
the
journal
can continue under a new editor, but matters will only become clearer
late in the summer of 2004.
The
Paper 7, November 2003.
(ed. David Kennedy, 29 Vickers Road, Firth Park, Sheffield S5 6UY.
ISSN 1474-8037, 64pp, £5 / $10. Subscriptions
(2 issues) £8. Cheques payable to D G Kennedy).
Excellent
reviews by Peter Manson of Maggie O'Sullivan (Palace of Reptiles),
by Pete Smith of Barry MacSweeney (Wolf Tongue) and by
Robin Purves of J H Prynne (Triodes). Poetry by Pierre
Joris and Elizabeth James (the latter particularly good), and a
'talk' by Erin Mouré. A surprise in this company is Michael
Symmons Roberts on 'praise poetry' in a secular age, and a good
essay it
is. All round, a very good issue. Recommended, though I understand
the issue has, in fact, sold out.
PN
Review 156, March-April
2004. (ed. Michael Schmidt, 72pp, A4
perfect-bound, £6.99. ISSN0144-7076. ISBN 1-85754-678-4. Subscriptions
for 6 issues £29.50. Write to PN Review, Alliance House, 30 Cross
Street, Manchester M2 7AQ).
This
magazine can be, and often is, a real delight, the sort of thing
you can take on a long and thoughtful train journey, knowing you
won't have to put it down at any point because of boredom or for
lack of things to read. The reviews are wide-ranging
of course, as they always are in this magazine, but the real gems
lie in the original work: short 'reports' by Marius Kociejowski
and R F Langley; Eavan Boland's excellent essay-review of the Robert
Duncan/Denise Levertov correspondence; fine long poems by John
Matthias & Robert Minhinnick; Liam Guilar on Layamon / Lawman;
Philip Terry's prose tour-de-force 'A Brief Anthology of Jazz'
(which is not what it sounds like); James Keery's ongoing analysis
of the 1940s; and the cream of the crop in a new group of poems
Tableaux 1-XX by the irrepressible Christopher Middleton:
20 unlinked poems spread in double-columns over six-and-a-half
pages — worth the price of admission on their own.
Poetry
Ireland Review 78 (ed.
Peter Sirr, 120pp, pb, €7.99; One-year subscription (4 issues)
€40.50, 2 years €76. ISBN 1-902121-16-3. Subscriptions
for 6 issues £29.50.
Write to 120
St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland).
This
is Peter Sirr's second issue in charge of PIR, and a handsome-looking
periodical it is. Now, permit me first to issue a health-warning
— this issue includes my review of Christopher Middleton from
the Book of the Month, November 2003 on this site, and I may also
appear
in the next issue, so any praise here might conceivably be regarded
as being compromised. Please be assured that the responses below
try to be objective.
There
are poems here by Nuala Ní Dhomnhaill (in Irish only), Gregory
O'Donoghue,
Ian Duhig, Peter Didsbury, Peter, Robinson, Peter Porter,
Sarah Maguire, Peter Carpenter et al; decent translations of Günter
Grass by H-C Oezer; essays by Duhig, Didsbury, Robinson and Austin
Clarke; plus a good set of reviews of Irish and British books. PIR
is a kind of Irish analogue to Britain's Poetry Review and,
commendably, looks further afield than one might expect it to,
given its status as a national organ. In general, the poetry printed
tends to the prevailing style that you would expect, but it is —
without exception — very well-written (and my great bugbear
is sloppy mainstream
writing, not this kind). The presence of Louis Armand, the Prague-based
Australian poet, confounds expectations somewhat.
Eamon
Grennan's ten-page engagement with the vast Collected
Poems of Robert Lowell — whom I met several
times in his late years, and some of whose poetry I greatly admire —
is a model of its kind. Serious,
deft, picking up the threads and also classifying them for a potential
reader. It's the best review I've read of the book, which
is an important, if infuriating publication, though I'd suggest
the interested reader also look out the issue of Metre referred
to above, where the symposium on Lowell is good reading.
In short, a fine issue, and a journal worthy of serious attention.
Poetry
Review Vol 94 No. 1, Spring 2004 (ed.
David Herd & Robert Potts, 120pp, pb, £7.95 plus £1.05 p&p; ISBN
1-900-771-39-X; ISSN 0032-2156. One-year subscription (4 issues)
£30,
ex-UK £40 (airmail), USA $56. Subscriptions for 6 issues £29.50.
Write to 22 Betterton
Street, London WC2H 9BX.)
Some
fine poetry from John Ashbery, Michael Haslam, Estill Pollock,
Sarah Maguire, Deryn Rees-Jones, among others. Stimulating essays
by Peter Middleton on literary politics and the folly of binaries,
and by Andrea Brady on the New Collected Oppen. Some solid reviewing,
as usual, and once again of a range of publications, from small
presses out to the big London publishers — which is as it should
be. Poetry Review continues to be a standard-bearer of
quality under its new editorship.